US Attack on Iran: Imminent

[ColonelHardstone]

It is my humble opinion that American attack on Iran is now almost certain.

May Allah Ta'ala protect this Ummah and all the believers from the Fitnah of Dajjal and grant all believers safety and security (Ameen).

[ColonelHardstone]

Palestinian Scholars Page (AI Translation Below):

The Dialectic of the Zionist Risk, the Iranian Risk, and Today’s Duty in This Battle

In these difficult times, under Zionist belligerence in our region and Israel’s explicit declaration of its intention to reshape the area under its control—what it calls “Greater Israel,” as envisaged by Israel and its allies—we must clearly determine our religious and political stance amid the ongoing Israeli–Iranian conflict, based on legitimate interests and what's demanded of Muslims individually, by scholars, governments, and nations.

Much of our perspective is shaped by our view of both parties and the tragedies each has inflicted. Undeniably, both Iran and Israel have caused great harm to Muslim countries. Iran once asserted control over four Arab capitals, sowing instability—although that influence has since receded; Iran has been expelled from Syria, and its role in Lebanon and Iraq has been diminished.

Meanwhile, Israel is a settler-colonial entity—existing solely on stolen land and holy sites—it occupies all of Palestine and parts of Syria and Lebanon. It dominates the region, waging a brutal war particularly in Gaza for nearly two years and desecrating sacred places. Its leaders openly aim to restructure the region under Israeli dominance, with American backing. Israel is even attacking Iran and bombing Syrian territory, killing and detaining people in places like Quneitra and western Daraa, and posing threats to Pakistan’s nuclear program and Turkey—seeing no nation’s existence as legitimate unless under its supremacy.

Many public statements, articles, tweets, and government positions treat these two as equal dangers—as if we can sit back and watch them fight it out. Some even hope for the oppression of two oppressors—“that the oppressors destroy each other while we emerge unscathed.”

But will we really emerge unscathed under current conditions? Or are we already caught in the crossfire? Is the danger truly symmetric, and is neutrality the correct stance? Or is this a much graver situation, where today’s attacker has us in its sights next?

We must not dwell too much on historical grievances when addressing a battle of the present and future. Yes, we should not forget Iran’s past wrongs in Sunni lands—but our focus in this Israel–Iran context must be forward-looking, not backward.

If Israel triumphs—God forbid—it will soon target Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Pakistan, Turkey, and others, following its priorities and leadership's statements. And with American and European support, its threat will be immediate.

To Syrians especially (who have the most fresh wounds from Iran), remember: Israel is not just aiming at Iran and Palestine; its ambitions extend to all our lands. While Iran may act aggressively if it wins, its capacity is constrained by surrounding hostility.

We urge all Muslims—and especially scholars, who rally and inspire—to understand thoroughly and not allow grief or anger to drive them to stances that inadvertently align with Israel. We must take a realistic view guided by national and religious interest, not emotions.

I'm not asking anyone to forget the spilled blood or violated honor of the past. But what matters now is safeguarding collective existence moving forward.

If we look at individual countries, each is in Israel’s crosshairs if it wins. It is not just a threat to Palestine—it is potentially a threat to all of us.

We need greater awareness and deeper reflection in these conditions. Our governments must recognize this and stand against Zionist tyranny and expansion. Neutrality—or worse, tacit alignment—is unacceptable.

I propose forming a real coalition of Pakistan, Iran, Indonesia, Malaysia, Afghanistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and other Muslim nations to unite and resist the American–Zionist offensive.

Our people must pressure their leaders toward this alliance, resisting emotional urges that may inadvertently aid our enemy in this critical moment.

In Islamic jurisprudence, Imam al-Sarakhsi said that if a Muslim lives in infidel territory and is attacked by other infidels, they may not side with the attackers unless it serves Muslim interests. That principle applies today—neutrality is not permissible, and siding with Zionists is not even by “well wishes” or prayers. We must stand firmly for our freedom and collective interest.

 

AI Summary:

1. Both Iran and Israel have harmed Muslims, but Israel poses a far greater and more immediate threat.
2. Neutrality is dangerous; Zionist aggression threatens all Muslim countries.
3. A pan-Muslim alliance (Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Malaysia, etc.) is urgently needed.
4. Scholars and governments should guide people toward unity over emotional reactions.

 

Edited 5 hours ago by ColonelHardstone